Shared navigation
Menus, drawers, search, focus order, and keyboard behavior.
Digital Accessibility Engineering
ClearAccess identifies accessibility barriers, fixes them in the underlying code, validates the improvements, and monitors digital experiences for regressions.
Find the barriers. Fix the code. Validate the experience. Monitor what changes.
Automated testing provides a useful starting point but cannot identify every accessibility issue.
Platform coverage
Root-cause remediation
Accessibility defects often originate in shared navigation, theme templates, forms, product interfaces, and reusable design patterns. Treating every page as a separate repair can waste time and leave the underlying defect in place.
ClearAccess prioritizes repairs to shared code whenever the implementation supports it, then validates representative pages and workflows to confirm the broader effect.
Operating principle: Fix root causes, not individual pages.
Menus, drawers, search, focus order, and keyboard behavior.
Cards, variants, filters, collections, carts, and account flows.
Labels, instructions, validation, errors, and status messages.
Dialogs, tabs, accordions, alerts, carousels, and design-system controls.
Engineering lifecycle
The scanner opens the conversation. Professional review, remediation, validation, and monitoring create the lasting value.
Automated scanning identifies detectable issues and helps prioritize where professional review should begin.
We examine code, components, templates, user flows, keyboard operation, focus behavior, forms, structure, and dynamic interactions.
We implement human-reviewed fixes in the website, theme, shared component, template, or application code.
We re-scan, review code, test keyboards and focus, verify representative components, and perform appropriate assistive-technology checks.
Scheduled checks help surface regressions introduced by new content, releases, plugins, integrations, and design changes.
Services
Scope is shaped by the platform, code ownership, repeated components, critical user journeys, third-party dependencies, and the manual testing the experience requires.
Engineering analysis of components, templates, user flows, keyboard behavior, focus handling, forms, semantic structure, contrast, and dynamic interfaces.
Deliverable: prioritized findings and a practical remediation path.
Direct implementation in Shopify themes, Liquid, WordPress and WooCommerce front ends, React, Next.js, and custom application code.
Priority: shared causes and revenue-critical journeys.
Verification that repairs work as intended across representative pages and interactions without introducing new barriers.
Methods: re-scanning, code review, keyboard, focus, browser, and component testing.
Scheduled checks, regression review, issue triage, and engineering guidance as active digital experiences change.
Purpose: preserve prior improvements and catch regressions earlier.
Semantic HTML, headings, landmarks, accessible names, ARIA correction, status messages, and content relationships.
Keyboard navigation, focus management, menus, dialogs, tabs, accordions, forms, validation, and error handling.
Product templates, collections, filters, carts, shared UI components, design systems, and custom front-end workflows.
Practical impact
The objective is not a scanner score. It is a more understandable, operable, and resilient experience for real people using different devices and assistive technologies.
Free automated scan
Run a free scan to identify detectable issues and receive a prioritized starting point for professional review and remediation.
Automated testing identifies certain detectable accessibility issues but cannot evaluate every requirement or user experience. Results should be treated as a technical risk indicator and starting point for professional review and remediation.
Continuous monitoring
A remediated website can develop new barriers as teams publish, release, redesign, or install new technology. Monitoring helps identify regressions and protect the value of prior engineering work.
Monitoring supports continuous improvement. It is not permanent compliance, legal protection, or a replacement for periodic manual review.
Why ClearAccess
ClearAccess combines technical review, implementation, documentation, validation, and continued oversight while being explicit about what automation can and cannot establish.
The work continues beyond detection into implementation, review, and verification.
Shared code and repeated interface patterns are prioritized over isolated page patches.
Recommendations account for themes, components, front-end frameworks, integrations, and code ownership.
Automated findings are treated as a starting point, not proof of complete accessibility or legal compliance.
Start with a scan. Continue with engineering.
Understand the highest-priority barriers and discuss the technical work required to improve the experience.